Thanks for sharing your reflection for blog 1, Devin. I think that tennis coaching is a perfect example to use for this reflection, and I appreciate your ability to be so introspective about it. I think the way that you were able to articulate the progression from constructivist/behaviourist approaches with beginners to using a cognitivist approach with advanced players shows a great understanding of the different types of learning. It demonstrates that you have a clear understanding of how different instructional methods can be tailored to the varying skill levels of theplayers you coach.
The emphasis you put on using modified constraints was something that stood out to me. Smaller courts, slower balls, etc, that help players learn the game and gain confidence and control in the sport. It goes to show the positive effects that reducing cognitive overload in the early stages of learning can set the foundation for better learning outcomes in the long run.
As a coach myself, I agree that it isn’t a “one-size-fits-all” practice. It requires different types of instruction for different players. You take a great approach when it comes to helping players of varying levels build skills to move forward from where they are. Thanks again for sharing! I really enjoyed reading about the connections to learning styles you were able to make.
Sharidyn
Leave a Reply